6/22/2023 0 Comments Retrospective relief![]() It did not purport to limit prospective relief, which Plaintiffs seek here by requesting an injunction against the future enforcement of the Payments Provisions ( see Am. Second, Collins created a standard for deciding when to grant “retrospective relief” that would have required hundreds of millions of dollars in payments to the federal Treasury to be “completely undone.” Id. It does no such thing.įirst, Collins did not address whether a legislative rule adopted by an unlawfully insulated agency head is void ab initio, because the action at issue there was a contractual agreement, and it was adopted by a duly removable agency head. The Bureau now argues that Collins somehow bars the relief that Plaintiffs seek here. Yellen, the Supreme Court struck down the statutory removal protection for the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and remanded for the lower courts to consider what relief is appropriate. RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY Is Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton a Criminal?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |